| Contents |
The checklist of review criteria -- Improving scholarship: The role of peer review -- A measure of success -- Enhancing a resource for reviewers: an update to the guide -- Review criteria for research manuscripts task force members -- Chapter 1. Review process -- Chapter 2. Selection and qualities of reviewers -- Chapter 3. Review forms and reviewer comments -- Chapter 4. Publication decision -- Chapter 5. Manuscript revision and final editing -- Chapter 6. Problem statement, conceptual framework, and research question -- Chapter 7. Reference to the literature and documentation -- Chapter 8. Relevance -- Chapter 9. Research design -- Chapter 10. Instrumentation, data collection, and quality control -- Chapter 11. Population and sample -- Chapter 12. Data analysis and statistics -- Chapter 13. Results: presentation -- Chapter 14. Results: reporting statistical analyses -- Chapter 15. Results: reporting qualitative findings -- Chapter 16. Discussion and conclusion: interpretation -- Chapter 17. Tittle, author, and abstract -- Chapter 18. Reviewing a review manuscript -- Chapter 19. Reviewing descriptions of innovations -- Chapter 20. Presentation and documentation -- Chapter 21. Scientific conduct -- Chapter 22. Reviewer's recommendation -- Chapter 23. Reviewer's etiquette -- Afterword. Peer review now and in 2030? |
