ECU Libraries Catalog

Debating gun control : how much regulation do we need? / David DeGrazia and Lester H. Hunt.

Author/creator DeGrazia, David author.
Other author/creatorHunt, Lester H., 1946- author.
Format Book and Print
Publication Info New York, NY : Oxford University Press, [2016]
Descriptionxvi, 269 pages ; 21 cm.
Subject(s)
Series Debating ethics
Debating ethics. ^A1093321
Contents The case against -- The case in favor.
Abstract Americans have a deeply ambivalent relationship to guns. The United States leads all nations in rates of private gun ownership, yet stories of gun tragedies frequent the news, spurring calls for tighter gun regulations. The debate tends to be acrimonious and is frequently misinformed and illogical. The central question is the extent to which federal or state governments should regulate gun ownership and use in the interest of public safety. In this volume, David DeGrazia and Lester Hunt examine this policy question primarily from the standpoint of ethics: What would morally defensible gun policy in the United States look like? Hunt's contribution argues that the U.S. Constitution is right to frame the right to possess a firearm as a fundamental human right. The right to arms is in this way like the right to free speech. More precisely, it is like the right to own and possess a cell phone or an internet connection. A government that banned such weapons would be violating the right of citizens to protect themselves. This is a function that governments do not perform: warding off attacks is not the same thing as punishing perpetrators after an attack has happened. Self-protection is a function that citizens must carry out themselves, either by taking passive steps (such as better locks on one's doors) or active ones (such as acquiring a gun and learning to use it safely and effectively). In debating this important topic, the authors elevate the quality of discussion from the levels that usually prevail in the public arena. DeGrazia and Hunt work in the discipline of academic philosophy, which prizes intellectual honesty, respect for opposing views, command of relevant facts, and rigorous reasoning. They bring the advantages of philosophical analysis to this highly-charged issue in the service of illuminating the strongest possible cases for and against (relatively extensive) gun regulations and whatever common ground may exist between these positions.--AMAZON.
Bibliography noteIncludes bibliographical references and index.
Issued in other formOnline version: DeGrazia, David, author. Debating gun control. New York : Oxford University Press, [2016] 9780190251277
LCCN 2016010462
ISBN9780190251260 paperback ; alkaline paper
ISBN0190251263 paperback ; alkaline paper
ISBN9780190251253 hardcover ; alkaline paper
ISBN0190251255 hardcover ; alkaline paper

Available Items

Library Location Call Number Status Item Actions
Joyner General Stacks HV7436 .D446 2016 ✔ Available Place Hold